Well I have wanted a drone for awhile but never got around to it. I admit I saw the B&H deal for the EVO II 640T enterprise package and got one...then bought a RTK module for it. Then so I can learn to fly before doing something dumb and $$$$, picked up a Nano+.
Yes I was aware support will be discontinued in like Oct 2024 for the EVO 2 before my purchase. The EVO II V3 version will still have most of the replaceable parts. Firmware upgrades or if something bigger breaks it will be difficult to get it fixed due to this. The reason I went with Autel is the fact I won't be "geo-locked out" from being able to fly. I live somewhat close to an airport so I don't want to deal with the hassle of all that. I also picked up the Nano+ because Ibelieve both can wish both could have used the same app though the EVO II has a dedicated controller and shouldn't need a phone (both use Autel apps but one is explorer and the other is sky). From what it appears from videos is the Nano can track/follow subjects but the DJI is WAY better at it, hopefully this improves a lot.
First question is how close does the Nano fly compared to the EVO II V2. I figure the Nano will be a bit more "twitchy" but other than that be somewhat similar in low wind conditions.
Second question (s): I will probably just go ahead and apply for Part 107 so I can have the option to fly at night. I will have to register the EVO 2 regardless but so long as I don't add weight to the Nano+ it won't require it...but I assume if I wanted to fly that at night it would require registration as well. I know come Sept of 2023 I will need a RID module for the EVO, not sure if the Nano+ has this built in already or not. At this point I might just refrain from flying the Nano at night and forget the registration on it. The part 107 will also allow me to possibly make money if I find a gig I like to do but not the primary purpose and understand it will cost me $175 every two years to take a test.
One of my first goals is to map a lot of property I have. I would take the 3d map and insert it into a home designer software so I could plan for the walkout basement and other things. This will also give me an idea if I would like to do stuff like this for profit or not. This was the reason behind the RTK module though at this point I am not sure what I need to buy and make the connection "whole." I think I need some sort of ground station on site for the best results but not sure on that.
Overall if I am happy with it I could see myself getting an EVO II V3 enterprise later, I see the Nano+ can use the SE controller like the EVO II V3. I wonder if the Nano+ can use the 7.9" V3 controller as well?
Any tips or suggestions I am all ears, thanks.
Yes I was aware support will be discontinued in like Oct 2024 for the EVO 2 before my purchase. The EVO II V3 version will still have most of the replaceable parts. Firmware upgrades or if something bigger breaks it will be difficult to get it fixed due to this. The reason I went with Autel is the fact I won't be "geo-locked out" from being able to fly. I live somewhat close to an airport so I don't want to deal with the hassle of all that. I also picked up the Nano+ because I
First question is how close does the Nano fly compared to the EVO II V2. I figure the Nano will be a bit more "twitchy" but other than that be somewhat similar in low wind conditions.
Second question (s): I will probably just go ahead and apply for Part 107 so I can have the option to fly at night. I will have to register the EVO 2 regardless but so long as I don't add weight to the Nano+ it won't require it...but I assume if I wanted to fly that at night it would require registration as well. I know come Sept of 2023 I will need a RID module for the EVO, not sure if the Nano+ has this built in already or not. At this point I might just refrain from flying the Nano at night and forget the registration on it. The part 107 will also allow me to possibly make money if I find a gig I like to do but not the primary purpose and understand it will cost me $175 every two years to take a test.
One of my first goals is to map a lot of property I have. I would take the 3d map and insert it into a home designer software so I could plan for the walkout basement and other things. This will also give me an idea if I would like to do stuff like this for profit or not. This was the reason behind the RTK module though at this point I am not sure what I need to buy and make the connection "whole." I think I need some sort of ground station on site for the best results but not sure on that.
Overall if I am happy with it I could see myself getting an EVO II V3 enterprise later, I see the Nano+ can use the SE controller like the EVO II V3. I wonder if the Nano+ can use the 7.9" V3 controller as well?
Any tips or suggestions I am all ears, thanks.
Last edited: