I am not surprised by any of this. DJI has been on multiple "target lists" for some time. My personal opinion is I still have not read something that convinces me that they are 100% stealing information. I have read articles claiming they are and they are not. I do admit I would not be surprised if they were stealing information and the definitive proof does appear.
My opinion is part of this is to get rid of the big player. DJI still dominates consumer and prosumer drones.
The Blue sUAS program while a good start did not really provide the cost effective family of drones that meets what is needed to replace DJI drones. They are expensive, have inferior sensors, lack the customer support, accident protection, and just a lack of software and integration. Why would I buy an Anafi USA with 320 thermal resolution for $7K when I can get a Mavic 2 Enterprise Advanced for $6.5 K with accident protection, and almost double the thermal resolution? Check out the pricing on the other sUAS drones, $7K is child's play for some of their pricing.
I agree goldenu2, with Autel being an "American" company will help them, but I would think that if DJI is completely banned and Autel becomes the "new DJI" with the lead in sales, they could probably be next. There are so many factors at play here, some of them real, some of them politics and money.
If an American company made a drone with similar capabilities as a drone I was about to buy, and was within a reasonable price difference, I would no doubt look into it. But, as with any purchase I am not going to buy "American" for an inferior, more expensive product, especially with the blur of how much of the labor and hardware is really American.