It's a waste of time, it's already been done to death on YouTube and in my eyes is a flawed comparison method.
Do photo captures as RAW files, all sunny or daylight WB and the same ISO's, so people can see unedited images, rather than edited by the bird (in the drone) comparisons, as that is what you are going to get if you use auto settings. The EVO is not tailored to the auto crowd at all, really, whereas the Phantom and Mavic are; therefore it is a biased comparison from the outset.
For video, capture in the according Log formats for each bird, with ND filters in place and according to the 180 shutter angle technique, with proper exposure achieved on all birds and using the same frame rate and capture standards.
Make all unedited captures and footage available for people to freely download and compare apples to apples. Many people are able to colour grade only using LUT's; for them colour grading may present too big a challenge to learn to do properly, so they will not see the benefit of certain Log format captures.
Present your edited footage of the RAW and Log captures, but explain honestly that it is your best efforts with that footage and that others may be able to achieve better. Presenting auto captures is not an ethical comparison, unless you label it as such and make mention of the facts that certain drones are aimed at that audience of users that need auto output and that other drones are not.